PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
EPUB (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or DIALOGUS magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the UMECIT and DIALOGUS logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
In this era called by some industrial era 4.0 in the 21st century, a series of requirements arise that each individual needs to perform with economic and social solvency in society, one of these most outstanding conditions is to have high-level thinking skills that can be useful and functionally applied in terms of building the society that the 21st century demands. It is therefore logical to understand why thinking skills are a relevant and decisive component in the educational process. What is evident is that in order to give a correct response to the demands of the 21st century, it is necessary and pertinent that knowledge is supported by the capacity for critical thinking, that it is assumed and projected in a creative way, and reaches an association that allows the implementation of information and communication technologies (ICT). It is notorious today that the teaching of chemistry has become a very complex task for teachers. On the one hand, the process of updating educational plans must be continuous in the profession. In such a way that the teacher needs an adequate planning, which includes the use of a language that is easy to understand, for the students, facilitating the process of learning the explained contents, being an essential requirement the active participation of the student in the process as means of guaranteeing the success of the teaching work.
Keywords:
References
Bas, G., & Beyhan, O. (2019). Revisando el efecto de la enseñanza de estrategias de aprendizaje en el rendimiento académico: un metanálisis de los hallazgos. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación y Ciencia (IJRES), 5(1), 70-87.
Beltrán, J. (2003). Estrategias de Aprendizaje. Revista de Educación(332), 55-73. Obtenido de https://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/dam/jcr:0bc115bf-2ee5-4894-91f5-7e32e07059d4/re3320411443-pdf.pdf
Bonilla, J. (2020). Las dos caras de la educación en el COVID-19. CienciAmérica, 9(2).
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics .
Driscoll, M. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Duit, R. (2014). Teaching and learning the physics energy concept. Teaching and Learning of Energy in K12 Education .
Entin, E., & Feather, N. (1982). Attribution to success and failure in contingent and noncontingent paths. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
García, F., Fonseca, G., & Concha, L. (2015). Aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en educación superior: un estudio comparado. Revista Electrónica “Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 15(3), 1-26.
Gilbert, J. (2006). On the nature of ‘context’ in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976.
González, D., & Díaz, Y. (2006). La importancia de promover en el aula estrategias de aprendizaje para elevar el nivel académico en los estudiantes de Psicología. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 40(1), 1-17. Obtenido de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2098498
ICMSE . (2019). Sexta Conferencia Internacional sobre Matemáticas, Ciencias y Educación . Journal of Physics: Conference Series .
İlçin, N., Tomruk, M., Yeşilyaprak, S., Karadibak, D., & Savcı, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education.
Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2017). J. Sci. Teach. Educ.
Markus, H., & Nurtus, P. (1987). Possible selves. The interface between motivation and the self-concept en K. Yardley y T. Honess (Eds.), Self and Identity: Psychosocial Perspectives. New York: Wiley.
Maslow, A. (1983). The farther reaches of human nature. London: Penguin.
Mc. Combs, B., & Whisler, J. (1989). The role of affective variables in autonomous learning. Educational Psychologist, 24(3), 277-306.
Meneses, N. (2019). Neuroeducación. Sólo se puede aprender aquello que se ama, de Francisco Mora Teruel. Perfiles educativos, 41(165), 210-216. Obtenido de https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2019.165.59403
Millis, B. (2012). Active learning strategies in face-to-face classes. IDEA.
Omasheva, A., Sugralina, L., Minayeva, Y., & Salkeeva, L. (2018). Implementation of Active Learning and Assessment for Chemistry Courses. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS), 10, 77-84.
Pawlak, F., & Gross, K. (2019). Using classroom management to support inclusive chemistry learning. The Beauty and Pleasure of Understanding: Engaging with Contemporary Challenges Through Science Education, 359–366.
Pherez, G., Vargas, S., & Jerez, J. (2018). Neuroaprendizaje, una propuesta educativa: herramientas para mejorar la praxis del docente. Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas.
Rodríguez, E. (2013). El aprendizaje de la química de la vida cotidiana en la educación básica. Revista de Postgrado FACE-UC, 7(12), 363-373.
Román, J., & Gallego, S. (1994). Escala de Estrategias de Aprendizaje, ACRA. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Romero, A. (2009). La Dinámica de la Instrucción en el proceso educativo. Investigación Educativa, 13(23), 129 - 136.
Schunk, D. (1997). Teorías del aprendizaje (2ª ed). México: Prentice-Hall.
Seemiller, C. (2021). What makes learning enjoyable? Perspectives of today’s college students in the U.S. and Brazil. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(1).
Subagia, I. (2013). Pros. Semin. Nas. Undiksha : MIPA.
Subagia, I., & Wiratma, I. (2020). La eficacia de la estrategia de aprendizaje de química para mejorar el proceso de aprendizaje y los logros de los estudiantes. Serie de conferencias Journal of Physics.
Suciati, A., Imaningtyas, C., Anggraini, A., & Dermawan, Z. (2018). Pendidik. Indones: IPA .
Torres, A. (2020). La relación de liderazgo entre las teorias de liderazgo situacional y la acción humana. Navarra: Universidad de Navarra.
