PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
EPUB (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or DIALOGUS magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the UMECIT and DIALOGUS logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
This argumentative essay is based on the theoretical reflections that other authors have made about meaningful learning, reasoning at the same time how it could improve the teaching of economics in light of the theory of meaningful learning in David Ausubel’s classical vision; as well as the contributions of Moreira, among others. In teaching practice, most teaching strategies continue to promote mechanical, purely rote learning much more than meaningful learning. Reason for which, it is detailed what significant learning is, aspects to take into account, arguing that to achieve significant learning in economics it is necessary to start from the economic reality, from the facilitating role of the teacher in programming the content, when selecting the potential didactic material that adjusts to the cognitive structures of the student. In the reasoning, some economic realities are addressed, such as the market with monopolies, oligopolies, financial crises and the way in which they should be presented to the student, so that he can visualize how what he learns is useful for life, in such a way that he understands, analyze, reflect, achieve significant critical learning and actively participate in society; Achievements that can occur with the accompaniment and teaching guidance, teamwork and support of the new digital tools.
Keywords:
References
Gowin, D. B. (1981). Educating. Cornell University Press.
Marqués, P. (1999). Diseño Y Educación De Programas Educativos. https://cursos.clavijero.edu.mx/cursos/159_dmem/modulo5/documentos/Dise%C3%B1o%20y%20evaluaci%C3%B3n%20de%20programas%20educativos.pdf
Moreira, Marco Antonio. (2020). Aprendizaje Significativo: La isión clásica, otras visiones e interés. Proyecciones Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina ISSN: 1850-6242.
Moreira, M. A. (2011). Aprendizagem Significativa: A Teoria e Textos Complementares. Livraria Editora da Física.
Moreira, M. A. (2005). Aprendizagem Significativa Crítica. Instituto de Física da UFRGS.
Ongeri, Joseph D. (2009). ‘’Poor Student Evaluation of Teaching in Economics: A Critical Survey of The Literature’’, Australasian Journal of Economics Education, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.1-24
Renninger, K. A., Nieswandt, M. y Hidi, S. (Eds.) (2015). Interest in Mathematics and Science Learning. American Educational Research Association.
