PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
EPUB (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or DIALOGUS magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the UMECIT and DIALOGUS logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
When reading or talking about epistemology, the body of knowledge is categorized in philosophical currents, models or thoughts, and they mark their origins as something given, perhaps for comfort or perhaps for efficiency in the handling of knowledge; but the truth, is that the justice isn´t done to the path that knowledge has taken and the scope it has today, and even more so it is usually take it for granted that if we speak of a particular thinker, his argumentative evidence is relevant or sufficient to make this this or that affirmation, especially with the so called ancient philosophers. This is why we intend to show succinctly the possible pre-socratico origin of positivism (at least from the point of view of thought) following a temporal succession that goes from Parmenides, through Democritus, Pyrrho and ending in Auguste Comte considered the father of metaphysical scepticism or positivism, and about who, will be tackle the postulates that support his thought and the achieve that it has had in Europe. This is how it become evident that knowledge is a continuous work of thinkers over time, who give their contribution to make some ideas evolve and invalidate others, achiev the consolidation of knowledge in accordance with the historical, social, cultural and technological periods in wich the flourish of knowledge itself is found.
Keywords:
References
Aristóteles. (1994). Metafísica. (Calvo Martínez, T. Trad. 1ª ed.). Editorial Gredos. (Trabajo original publicado en: sin fecha).
Beltrán Marí, A. (2005). El “caso Galileo”, sin final previsible. Theoria, 20/2 (53). 125-141. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwifiLDpyvrsAhXFnOAKHU9lAjUQFjABegQIAhAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdialnet.unirioja.es%2Fdescarga%2Farticulo%2F1201625.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0U3fW1tkvYUGkSsCFFGkVB
Berthier, A. (2007) El pensamiento sociológico de Saint Simon. Pragma. https://antonioberthier.jimdofree.com/m%C3%A9xico-cultura-y-sociedad/cronolog%C3%ADa-de-auguste-comte/ferdinand-t%C3%B6nnies/saint-simon/
Brandmüller, Walter (1992). Galileo y la Iglesia. (E. Wannieck, Trad. 2ª ed.). Ediciones Rialp, Madrid. (Trabajo original publicado en: 1987).
Castany Prado, B. (2007). Breve Historia Del Escepticismo II: Época Clásica. Konvergencias, Filosofía y Culturas en Diálogo, (16), 54-75. http://www.konvergencias.net/castanyprado144.pdf
Comte, A. (2004). Curso de filosofía positiva. (1a ed.). Buenos Aires. Ediciones Libertador
Cordero, N. L. y Santa Cruz de Prunes, M. I. (1986). Leucipo y Demócrito. En Eggers Lan, C., Cordero, N. L., Poratti, A., Santa Cruz de Prunes, M. I. Los Filósofos Presocráticos III. Editorial Gredos S. A.
Daros, W. R. (2010) Epistemología y didáctica. Universidad del Centro Educativo
Latinoamericano UCEL. Edición digitalizada. https://williamdaros.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/epistemologia-y-didactica-todo.pdf
Gibert, J. y Gibert, J. (2016). Diccionario de epistemología. RIL editores.
https://elibro.net/es/ereader/umecit/67554?page=1
Kirk, G. S. y Raven, J. E. (1987). Los filósofos presocráticos. Historia crítica con selección de textos. Gredos.
Pérez Villamar, José. (2015). El positivismo y la investigación científica. Revista Empresarial, 9(3), 29-34. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwibwt2E_5btAhWlUt8KHfvuDisQFjAAegQIBRAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdialnet.unirioja.es%2Fdescarga%2Farticulo%2F6419741.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1PSKIeaIGFKjSUflzBWzwI
Rodríguez Donís, M. (1986). El Escepticismo de Demócrito. Thémata. Revista de Filosofía. Universidad de Sevilla, 101-114. http://institucional.us.es/revistas/themata/03/08%20donis.pdf
Román Alcalá, R. (2019). El escéptico Pirrón de Élide: el último presocrático y su conexión con la escuela de abdera. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 36(2), 321-334. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ASHF/article/view/57926/4564456551364
Vitoria. M. (2009). Positivismo. En: F. Fernández Labastida., J. A. Mercado. (Ed.). Philosophica: Enciclopedia filosófica on line. http://www.philosophica.info/archivo/2009/voces/positivismo/Positivismo.html
Zamudio Gómez, J. G. (2012). Epistemología y educación. Red Tercer Milenio. http://www.aliat.org.mx/BibliotecasDigitales/Educacion/Epistemologia_y_educacion.pdf
