The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or DIALOGUS magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the UMECIT and DIALOGUS logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
The development of information and communication technologies has boosted the evolution of societies, a key point being the transformation of teaching-learning processes. One of these technologies is augmented reality (AR) used as didactic material, allowing the interaction of the physical environment with virtual elements. The objective was identify the level of knowledge and application of AR tools in learning spaces by CEUTEC teachers in Honduras. The approach was quantitative, exploratory-descriptive in scope and a non-experimental-transversal design. A digital survey was applied to 126 CEUTEC teachers in the cities of Tegucigalpa, San Pedro Sula and La Ceiba. Forty-four percent of the teachers in the sample did not receive courses for technology management in teaching in the last year, 56% have little or no knowledge about AR and only 1% have used AR in their classes. The greatest perceived benefit of using AR is to increase student attention; the greatest limitation identified was connectivity and lack of specialized equipment. Teachers have little knowledge of AR, so they have not applied it in their learning spaces. It is necessary for the university to provide specialized spaces and training to teachers and for them to be committed to applying it.
Keywords:
References
Beigel, M. F., Bekerman, F. A., Algañaraz Soria, V. H., Baranger, D., Bayle, P. A., Erreguerena, F., & Salim, R. B. (2019). Culturas evaluativas: Impactos y dilemas del Programa de Incentivos a Docentes-Investigadores en Argentina (1993-2018). Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales. (5)
Bekerman, Fabiana Andrea; El programa de incentivos a los docentes-investigadores puertas adentro; Asociación Argentina de Sociología; Horizontes Sociológicos; 10; 6; 12-2018; 115-137 (6)
Bernal, I. A. M. (2012). Estado del arte sobre tutorías. Civilizar, 12(22), 167-175. (8)
Burgo Bencomo, O. B., León González, J. L., Cáceres Mesa, M. L., Pérez Maya, C. J., & Espinoza Freire, E. E. (2019). Algunas reflexiones sobre investigación e intervención educativa. Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar,48 Artículo disponible en: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/383/344 (3)
Garzón-Pascagaza, E. J. La Formación Política como Dispositivo Intelectual en la Educación Superior Colombiana (2000-2016) (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Santo Tomás). (2)
Holguín, E. C., & Sandoval, P. R. G. (2020). El profesorado como agente de cambio educativo: entre la docencia y la investigación. Educación y ciudad, (38), 59-72. (4)
Pacheco, Julián Andrés; Hurtado Tarazona, Alejandra. Estrategias para mejorar el impacto de las publicaciones indexadas en Publindex, ISI, Scopus y SciELO: el caso de la Universidad Santo Tomás, Colombia. Hallazgos, vol. 10, núm. 19, enero-junio, 2013, pp. 175-191 (7)