Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Bolaño Navarro, E. J., Gonzalez Perez, S., & Monsalvo De León, L. E. (2024). The reality of the competition curriculum in Colombia. Dialogus Jornal, 1(13), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.37594/dialogus.v1i13.1247
License terms

The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or DIALOGUS magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the UMECIT and DIALOGUS logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others      They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.

Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.

                                                               

Abstract

The article entitled The Reality of the competency Based Curriculum in Colombia, addresses the transformation of the curriculum in the country since its enactment of the Political Constitution of 1991 and the General Education Law. The objective is to analyze the Colombian curricular reality: considering aspects such as: the competency-based curriculum, educational policies and the quality referents, and curricular autonomy in educational institutions was addressed, from the question how effective and beneficial has this autonomy been?

The research was descriptive, with a non-experimental design. Its methodology was based on the search for relevant information. The topic was investigated through a questionnaire addressed by the essayist, consultation of bibliographic sources, review of journals, videos, scientific articles, books, observation and inductive derivation, which allowed the analysis of the historical evolution of the curriculum since its roots in the University of Glasgow to the innovative proposals of authors such as Stephen Kemmins and John Franklin Bobbitt.

The results show that Colombia faces a palpable contradiction when this ideal of autonomy is overshadowed by standardized evaluation processes, meticulously designed under the aegis of international agencies with agendas clearly aligned to global economies; relegating the very purpose of evaluation and its harmonization with the diverse realities that make up the cultural and social mosaic of the nation.

In conclusion, the importance of understanding the Colombian curricular reality through competency-based approaches stands out, and the question of the effectiveness and benefits of this transformation in the educational system is raised. The article offers a reflective look at the evolution of the competency-based curriculum in Colombia, highlighting its implications, challenges and the balance between school autonomy and governmental guidelines.

Keywords:

References

Abadía, L.K. (2023). Colombianos por debajo de la media en Pruebas PISA 2022. Recuperado de https://ifmnoticias.com/colombianos-por-debajo-de-la-media-en-pruebas-pisa-2022/

Bobbitt, F. (1918). The Curriculum. Nueva York: Houghton.

Bobbitt, F. (1924). How To Make a Curriculum. Boston: Houghton.

Del Basto, S., Liliana, M., & Ovalle, A. (2015). Una mirada crítica a la relación currículo sociedad (Vols. 11, pp.111-127). (R. L. Educativos, Ed.) Manizales: Universidad de Caldas.

Diaz, V. M. (2002). Flexibilidad y Educación Superior en Colombia. ICFES.

Duque, Iván. (2020) “Generación E”. (2020). Recuperado de https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/salaprensa/Noticias/402586

EISNER, E. W. (1987) Procesos cognitivos y currículum (Barcelona, Martínez Roca)

Forteza, M. D., & Pomar, M. I. (1997). Perspectivas curriculares para los alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales. En A. Sánchez

Palomino & J. A. Torres González (Coords.), Educación Especial: Una perspectiva curricular, organizativa y profesional (pp. 223-242). Madrid: Pirámide.

González, A. M. (1998). La dinámica del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje mediante sus componentes. En F. Addine, et. al. Didáctica. Teoría y práctica. Ciudad de la Habana: Pueblo y Educación.

González, F. (1998). Un currículum común para todos. Universidad de Vigo. Resumen. Recuperado de https://ruc.udc.es › bitstream › handle › RGP_3-11

Kemmins, S. (1988). La Naturaleza de la Teoría del Currículum. En Currículum: Más allá de la Teoría de la Reproducción. Madrid: Morata. Pág.19-46

Marsh, C. J. (1992). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. London: Falmer Press.

Martínez, B. (2014). Cómo implementar un diseño curricular basado en competencias. Experiencia docente, 11(2). Recuperado de https://revistas.ecci.edu.co

Ministerio de Educación Nacional (MEN). (1994). Ley 115 de febrero 8 de 1994. Por la cual se expide la ley general de educación. En G. d. Colombia (Ed.), 115 (pp. 50). Bogotá.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2018). Educación inclusiva. Recuperado de https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-article-374740.html?_noredirect=1

OCDE (2023), Resultados de PISA 2022 (Volumen I): El estado del aprendizaje y la equidad en la educación, PISA, Publicaciones de la OCDE, París, https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en .

Parra, O. (2012). Pensando en la labor del docente: un estudio comparado sobre la evaluación de su desempeño profesional. Buenos Aires, Argentina. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2YaPtpf

Rodríguez, H. (2023). “Política de Gratuidad” (2023). Recuperado de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Nmco8G2oro&t=828s

Santos, J.M. (2017). “Ser Pilo Paga”. Recuperado de https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-printer-360407.html

Stake, R. (1998). Investigación con estudio de casos. Madrid: Morata

Tobón, S. (2006). Formación Basada en Competencias. Pensamiento complejo. Bogotá: Ecoe ediciones.

Tobón, S., et al. (2006). Competencias, Calidad y Educación Superior. Bogotá: Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.

Tyler, R. (1973). Principios básicos del currículo. Buenos Aires: Troquel. (Trabajo original publicado en 1986)

Tyler, R., & Taba, H. (2007). Las Teorías Curriculares: Modelo Racional Normativo (II).

Ralph W. Tyler: biografía y aportes de este educador estadounidense. Portal Psicología y Mente. https://psicologiaymente.com/biografias/ralph-w-tyler

UNESCO. (2013). Informe de la Comisión Internacional sobre la Educación para el Siglo XXI. Madrid, España: Santillana/UNESCO. pp. 91-103. Recuperado de http://www.unesco.org/new/es

Uribe, J. (2015). Hacia un currículo contextualizado. Recuperado de https://posgradoeducacionuatx.org

Villarini, A. R. (2003). Currículo, formación integral y calidad de vida en el contexto del caribe colombiano. Consenso, 1(1), 99-110.

Zabalza, M. A. (2016). Diseño y desarrollo curricular. Narcea Ediciones. Recuperado de https://elibro.net/es/ereader/umecit/45989?page=49

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by

##cited.by##