The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or DIALOGUS magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the UMECIT and DIALOGUS logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
In this article, a literature review is conducted to explore the possibilities of how the sociocritical paradigm (Frankfurt School, Latin American thinkers) can favor the epistemic thinking (Latin American thinkers) of doctoral-level researchers, where they begin to question reality from an epistemic standpoint. Epistemic thinking involves sensing, questioning, and acting upon the (plural, complex, dynamic, polysemic) reality in order to explain, understand, transform, or problematize it. This way of thinking allows the researcher to consciously choose the direction of their research. In fact, doctoral-level researchers embark on their work with an epistemic mindset, which is strengthened through theoretical thinking, and they continuously ask questions about reality in propositional terms to formulate theses as expressions of epistemic thinking, where knowledge is characterized as original, innovative, and transformative. By employing a qualitative documentary approach and a bibliographic design using content review techniques and theoretical-reflexive analysis of literature related to the topic, the synergies between epistemic thinking and the sociocritical paradigm were analyzed, highlighting their capacity to challenge established forms of knowledge, promote the inclusion of marginalized voices, and construct a broader and more equitable framework. Through this analysis, the opportunities and benefits of adopting the sociocritical paradigm in the epistemic thinking of researchers are revealed, offering new perspectives and pathways for the generation of liberating, transformative, and contextually situated knowledge, as well as intellectual development, within socially constructed realities.
References
Ducoing Watty, A. M. (2018). Epistemologías y metodologías de la investigación educativa. Obtenido de Newton Edición y Tecnología Educativa: https://elibro.net/es/lc/umecit/titulos/130382
González Morales, A. (2003). Los paradigmas de investigación en las ciencias sociales. Cuba: Editorial Universitaria.
Massé Narvaez, C. (2005). Adorno pone en movimiento el pensamiento crítico a partir de la distinción y contraposición entre el sujeto, objeto y el conocimiento. Recuperado el junio de 2023, de Red Cinta de Moebio: https://elibro.net/es/ereader/umecit/11518
McLaren, P., & Leonard, P. (2002). Paulo Freire: A critical Encounter . Obtenido de Taylor & Francis Group: https://elibro.net/es/lc/umecit/titulos/145020
Multimedia DIDHZ. (2015). Conferencia Magistral: "Los desafíos que plantea el conocimiento en la construcción del objeto" [video]. Recuperado el junio de 2023, de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYMbaBPNUmg&t=572s
Packer, M. (2013). La ciencia de la investigación cualitativa. Obtenido de Universidad de los Andes: https://elibro.net/es/lc/umecit/titulos/69474
Zelmenman, H. (2005). Voluntad de conocer. El sujeto y su pensamiento en el paradigma crítico. Barcelona: ANTHROPOS.
Zelmenman, H. (2015). Pensamiento y construcción de conocimiento histórico, una exigencia para el hacer futuro. Recuperado el junio de 2023, de El Ágora USB: https://revistas.usb.edu.co/index.php/Agora/article/view/1618