PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
EPUB (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or DIALOGUS magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the UMECIT and DIALOGUS logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
This essay offers a reflection on the role that motivation, critical thinking and metacognition play within the teaching and learning process, in order to have consistent arguments that allow us to reflect on the statements and opinions that have emerged in lathe concept of quality of education. This is measured or determined from the results that come from both national and international tests as a criterion for excellence to judge whether an institution or educational process is of quality. For this reason, a series of reflections are exposed that allow us to contemplate that there are internal and external factors to the educational act that are constantly influencing the level of apprehension that is offered in the school and therefore they are decisive when arguing whether it is effectively It is before a process of educational quality.
References
Facione, P. (2007). Pensamiento Crítico:¿Qué es y por qué es importante? Insight assessment, 22. https://acortar.link/iitsn
López Aymes, G. (2012). Pensamiento crítico en el aula. Docencia e Investigación, (22), 41-60. https://ruidera.uclm.es/xmlui/handle/10578/9053
Montenegro, I. (2003). Aprendizaje y desarrollo de las competencias. Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.
Romero, P. (2019). Cómo liberarse de una educación equivocada. Transformando la educación tradicional. Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.
Roque Herrera, Y., Valdivia Moral, P. Á., Alonso García, S., & Zagalaz Sánchez, M. L. (2018). Metacognición y aprendizaje autónomo en la Educación Superior. Educación Médica Superior, 32(4), 293-302. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412018000400024
Ugartetxea, J. (2002). La metacognición, el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y la motivación escolar. Revista de Psicodidáctica, (13), 49-74. https://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/48116
Usán Supervía, P., & Salavera Bordás, C. (2018). Motivación escolar, inteligencia emocional y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de educación secundaria obligatoria. Actualidades en Psicología, 32(125), 95-112. https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2215-35352018000200095
Vasco, E. (1995). Maestros, alumnos y saberes. Investigación y docencia en el aula. Bogotá: Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.
Vásquez, F. (2007). Educar con maestría. Universidad de La Salle.
