Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Soler Gómez, P. C., & Zárate Cabrera, Z. (2024). Complexity and interdiscipline in the construction of a contemporary scientific psychology. Oratores Journal, 1(20), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.37594/oratores.n20.1427
License terms

The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the Metropolitan University of Education, Science and Technology (UMECIT) or of the journal ORATORES. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the logos of UMECIT AND ORATORES, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others      They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.

Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.

                                                               

Abstract

This essay puts forward an analysis of the evolution and transformation of psychology as a science and the scientific knowledge in general have suffered due to the emergence of the paradigm of complexity, putting into question the traditional approaches that from an unidisciplinary logic, the scientific explanations of problems and elements of reality have historically offered, and that without doing discredit to them have been relegated to the margin of the analysis of those phenomena whose nature is composed of a set of elements interdefinable only by their own interaction within the system, being necessary am interdisciplinary vision of science that responds to the characteristics and demands of these complex systems, that are only analyzable through a holistic logic that is inclusive of different theoretical, methodological and paradigmatical points of view. This essay presents, to begin with, the emergence of systemism as base of the logic of a complex reality, presenting its origins on the theory of systems, cybernetics and the theory of information, in order to give way to the description of Piaget’s and Ausubel’s postures derived from systemism and inscribed in the cognitive tradition, to present the way on how contemporary psychology has delved into the study of complex thought through the questioning of its own methodology for the construction of others corresponding to this new unit of analysis, to in conclusion delve into the description of interdisciplinarity and its differentiation with multidisciplinarity as the way to complex thought analysis of complex data.

Keywords:

References

Ausubel, D. (2002). Adquisición y retención del conocimiento. Una perspectiva cognitiva. Barcelona: Paidós.

Barberousse, P. (2008). Fundamentos teóricos del pensamiento complejo de Edgar Morin. Revista electrónica Educare, 12(2). Pp. 95-113. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1941/194114586009.pdf

Bernal, C. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. Colombia: Pearson.

García, R. (2006). Sistemas complejos. México: Gedisa.

Hernández, G. (2011). Paradigmas en psicología de la educación. México: Paidós Educador.

Jorge, M. (2003). Nuevos elementos para la reflexión metodológica en sociología. Del debate cuantitativo/cualitativo al dato complejo. Papers: Revista de sociología. Pp. 57-81.

Medina, I. (2006). Interdisciplina y complejidad: ¿hacia un nuevo paradigma? Perspectivas, 29. Pp. 89-130.

Moreno, J. (2002). Tres teorías que dieron origen al pensamiento complejo: sistémica, cibernética e información. En Velilla, M. (comp.). Manual de iniciación pedagógica al pensamiento complejo. (pp. 25-37). Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano para la Educación Superior-UNESCO.

Morin, E. (1994). Introducción al pensamiento complejo. (Trad. del fr. por Marcelo Pakman). Barcelona: Gedisa.

Piaget, J. (1967). Lógica y conocimiento científico. París: Gallimard.

Sampieri, H. R. y Mendoza, C. P. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México: McGraw-Hill.

Shannon, C. y Weaver, W. (1981). Teoría matemática de la información. Madrid: Forja.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by

##cited.by##