PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
EPUB (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the Metropolitan University of Education, Science and Technology (UMECIT) or of the journal ORATORES. They are protected by international copyright laws as well as the logos of UMECIT AND ORATORES, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
The contribution that the classic authors Augusto Comte, Max Weber and Carlos Marx have made to the Social Sciences from different areas has been very significant, these materialize in the foundation of currents such as positivism, sociology and Marxism. The present article not only tries to analyze how these authors through Christianity have maintained their thought but to understand the validity of the classic thought by means of appreciations to this religion.With some intellectual productions, these classics of the social sciences have established contrasts and similarities with respect to the usefulness of Christianity in history, from the positivist philosophy of Comte, he visualized it with the so-called law of the intellectual evolution of humanity or the law of the three stadiums. Weber, makes an interpretation of Christianity through his masterpiece the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of capitalism; and Marx, makes some considerations starting from the origin of Christianity and then analyzes the relationship with Marxism, at this point it was possible to show that in Latin America there are points of convergence.Regarding the conclusions, the most evident one emphasizes the relationship between Christianity and Marxism, which is more of ideological and political convenience than of philosophical essence.
Keywords:
References
Alvar, J, et al. (1995). Cristianismo primitivo y religiones mistéricas. Madrid. Ediciones Cátedra.
Álvarez Espinosa, D. F. (2009). Cristianismo y Marxismo: ¿un diálogo de otro tiempo? Historia Actual Online, (18), 161-177.
Comte, A. (1980). Augusto Comte: Discurso sobre el espíritu positivo. Prólogo Julián Marías. Madrid. Alianza Editorial S.A
Dussel, E. (1974). El dualismo en la antropología de la cristiandad. Buenos Aires. Guadalupe.
Engels, F. (1894). Sobre la historia del cristianismo originario. Año II - N° 2 - octubre de 2011. Revista Teórica de la LIT-CI
Lowy, M. (2006). Marxismo y Religión: ¿Opio del pueblo? Buenos Aires. Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
Mejía, C. (2013). Karl Marx y Max Weber: ¿ruptura o continuidad? Cali-Colombia. Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales (CLACSO)
Villegas, F. G. (2015). Max Weber y la guerra académica de los cien años: Historia de las ciencias sociales en el siglo XX. La polémica en torno a La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo (1905-2012). Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Weber [1906] 1972, 393). Citado por Villegas, F. G. (2015). Max Weber y la guerra académica de los cien años: Historia de las ciencias sociales en el siglo XX.
Weber (1997, 330). Citado por Villegas, F. G. (2015). Max Weber y la guerra académica de los cien años: Historia de las ciencias sociales en el siglo XX.
Weber, M. (2009). La ética protestante y el espíritu del capitalismo. Traducción de Denes Martos. Edición Original: 1904/1905. Argentina. www.laeditorialvirtual.com.ar
