Cathedra No. 4 Año 4 - Noviembre 2015 - Abril 2016
Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
Batista, W. (2017). Brief reflections on the principle of separation of functions in Panama adversarial system. Cathedra Journal, (4), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.37594/cathedra.n4.57
License terms

The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or CATHEDRA magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws just as the UMECIT and CATHEDRA logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others      They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.

Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.

                                                               

Abstract

A mainstay of judicial reform implemented in the Republic of Panama is the principle of separation of functions, whereby functions of investigation and prosecution are clearly defined, so that the prosecution cannot make decisions of a judicial nature which involving violation of fundamental rights of citizens and the judge it is prohibited from being acts of investigation. This article aims to outline the main areas in which affects the principle of separation of functions under the adversarial system according to law 63 of 2008, analyzing some problematic situations in which the application of that principle provides a compatible solution respect for the fundamental rights of citizens in a democratic rule of law.

Keywords:

References

BENAVENTE CHORRES, Hesbert (2012). La investigación judicial y el control de convencionalidad en el proceso penal: concepto y modalidades. Bosh Editor. Madrid, España.

CHIARA DIAZ, Carlos Alberto y otros (2014). Derecho procesal penal. Segundo tomo. Editorial Astrea, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

CÓDIGO PROCESAL PENAL DE LA REPÚBLICA DE PANAMÁ (2013). Panamá.

CONSTITUCIÓN POLÍTICA DE LA REPÚBLICA DE PANAMÁ (2005). Panamá.

GRANADOS PEÑA, Jaime Enrique y MORRIS LIEVANO, María Mónica. (2015) Principios rectores y garantías fundamentales, sistema penal acusatorio. Ediciones jurídicas Andrés Morales. Bogotá, Colombia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by

##cited.by##