PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
EPUB (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or CATHEDRA magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws just as the UMECIT and CATHEDRA logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
Different episodes of road accidents (traffic events) to which judicial decisions are added in favor of the freedom of drivers charged with crimes committed on the occasion of driving a car and the persistent claims of Civil Associations to incorporate the so-called Criminal Code Traffic offenses are, to a large extent, the factors that act as a trigger for regulations. What is intended is to provide some solution to all social conflicts, or at least, to those considered most important, although in reality they are not. In this way, criminal law - another understood as minimal intervention - is moving towards an indiscriminate criminalization of behaviors that, in many cases, do not even put at risk a certain legal good. Given the occurrence of a criminal act (or not criminal, but that society claims it to be) of great social impact, we observe an immediate reaction of the policy by calling the four winds the criminal reform to quickly resolve the conflict, whether creating new criminal types of suspicious constitutionality, particularly subject to a severe penalty or hardening penalties of already existing criminal types, thereby seeking to provide solutions usually merely symbolic or formal, more oriented to calm popular voracity than to give a real solution to social conflict.
References
ARTEAGA SANCHEZ JOSÉ, (sf.). La culpabilidad en la teoría del hecho punible, Universidad
BAJO FERNÁNDEZ MIGUEL, (2008). Nuevas tendencias en la concepción sustancial del injusto penal, InDret 3/2008, Revista para el Análisis del Derecho, disponible en www.indret.com
BETTIOL GIUSEPPE, (1965). Derecho penal, “Parte general”, Temis, Bogotá, Bibliografica Omeba, Buenos Aires, 1967.
CARMONA SALGADO CONCEPCIÓN, (1997). Delitos contra la seguridad del tráfico, en Derecho penal español, parte especial, (Dir. Manuel Cobo del Rosal), Madrid.
Central de Venezuela, Caracas, 1975.
Constitución Política de Colombia
Código Penal Colombiano Ley 599 de 2000, Ley 1326 de 2009, Ley 1826 de 2017.
Código de Procedimiento Penal Ley 906 de 2004
Código Nacional de Tránsito y Transporte. Ley 769 de 2002 Mdf. Ley 1383 de 2010
DE VICENTE MARTÍNEZ ROSARIO, Seguridad vial y Derecho penal. En especial el homicidio imprudente cometido con vehículo a motor”, disponible en www.unifr.ch.
FERNÁNDEZ BERMEJO DANIEL, El delito de conducción de vehículos de motor bajo la influencia de los efectos del alcohol, La Ley penal, No. 119-2016, Madrid, disponible en www.UDIMA.es.
FIGARI RUBÉN E., Mas consideraciones sobre los denominados delitos de tránsito, disponible en http://www.rubenfigari.com.ar
Policía Nacional, Dirección Nacional de Escuelas, Escuela de seguridad Vial, Investigación de Accidentes de Tránsito en Colombia.
Manual para diligenciar Informes Policiales de Accidentes de Tránsito, Resolución 0011268 de 2012.
