PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
EPUB (Español (España))
XML (Español (España))
The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or CATHEDRA magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws just as the UMECIT and CATHEDRA logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.
Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.
Abstract
Throughout the criminal procedural practice, many are the positions that have been discussed with respect to the figure of the victim or plaintiff, his or her actions and powers within the criminal process.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, there has been no major difficulty regarding the recognition of the rights of the victims, as well as the legal powers that may be exercised by the plaintiff once constituted as a plaintiff.
The crux of the discussion has always been the procedural timing of the filing of the complaint and any powers conferred by Article 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
This brief, but necessary essay will deal with this particular subject, and is not intended to convince any participant in the process of our particular criterion, however, we do intend to bring to the debate our position, and hope that it can be analyzed, discussed, and why not, be used as a point of consensus for the unity of criteria throughout the national territory.
Keywords:
References
Código Procesal Penal, 2011. Ley 63 agosto 28, 2008. 29 de agosto de 2008, (Panamá).
Corte Suprema de Justicia. Pleno (M. P. Olmedo Arrocha; junio 3 de 2020).
