Revista CATHEDRA 8
Dimensions

PlumX

How to Cite
ESPADA, M. (2018). The inimputability and the security measures. Cathedra Journal, (8). https://doi.org/10.37594/cathedra.n8.170
License terms

The content of the publications and the links suggested in them are the sole responsibility of the authors and not of the METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UMECIT) or CATHEDRA magazine. They are protected by international copyright laws just as the UMECIT and CATHEDRA logos, hence their reproduction is totally prohibited

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The authors maintain the copyright and transfer the right of the first publication to the journal, with the article registered with Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which allow others      They can download the works published in this magazine and share them with other people, as long as their authorship is recognized, but they cannot be changed in any way nor can they be used commercially.

Authors are recommended to include their work in social networks such as Researchgate and institutional repositories once the article or visible fact has been published on the journal page, without forgetting to include the digital document identifier and the name of the journal.

                                                               

Abstract

The behavior of the human being in society is limited to a series of norms that limit or constrain him to make adjusted decisions or not a socially accepted behavior. Freedom as a Human Right, offers the idea, above all to the citizen who is not linked to legal studies who, in an unlimited way, can materialize their decisions in their social environment, with knowledge of the consequences of their actions, or, with ignorance of the rules that govern their behavior. This capacity, for free thinking and free acting, irreversibly, brings with it a causal link, between the act produced and its effect or consequence. For Civil Law, for example, all acts are related to relations between individuals, who formally or informally, perform with their interaction contracts or quasi- contracts, and when not simply the consequences of a conduct derive offense or quasi- delict, all of the above, presuming that whoever performs the acts is a subject of law, according to the rules of the legal capacity of the people. In criminal matters, the behaviors that interest this branch of law, logically have to do with those not accepted by society, and have decided normatively, typify as negative behavior or crime. Determine then, under the principle of presumption of innocence, that a person committed a punitive conduct, is precisely to consider whether the alleged offender of the rule, meets the minimum requirements of criminal law, to impute the description of the criminal offense, and the consequences derived, both criminal (sanction), and civil (reparation of the damage). However, the mere performance of a criminal act does not automatically generate that the person who presumably did it is imputable, not because of the nature of the act itself, but because of the subjective protection of the rule, which focuses on the characteristic of the act. person who made it.

Keywords:

References

Diez, José Luis. Actual doctrina de imputabilidad penal. (2007). Málaga. Ediciones del Consejo general del Poder Judicial.

Gaviria T., J. (2006). Revista Colombiana de Psiquitaría Forense. Obtenido de http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rcp/v34s1/v34s1a05.pdf

Hernández, Florybeth. La imputabilidad e inimputabilidad desde el punto de vista médico legal. Obtenido de http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1409-00152015000200010

Martainez, Lucía (2011). La imputabilidad penal. Valencia. Ediciones Universidad Castilla de La Mancha.

Pavón, V. (1981). Código Penal Mexicano Comentado. II Edición. México: Editorial Purrúa.

Sampedro, Julio Andrés (1987). El problema fundamental de la inimputabilidad por trastorno mental. Bogotá. Editorial Temis.


NORMAS CONSULTADAS

Constitución Política de la República de Panamá. Código Penal de la República de Panamá

Ley 63 de 28 de agosto de 2008. Que adopta el Código Procesal Penal. Asamblea Nacional de la República de Panamá. Gaceta Oficial No.28221-B, 17 de febrero de 2017.

Ley 40 de 26 de agosto de 1999. Del régimen penal especial de adolescentes. Asamblea Nacional de la República de Panamá. Gaceta Oficial No.23874, 28 de agosto de 1999.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Cited by

##cited.by##